Differenze tra le versioni di "Translations:Itala Cromograf/2/en"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Riga 1: | Riga 1: | ||
− | But it seems that, at least from the point of view of the chamber of commerce registration, the date should be moved to the early '40s, since according to L. Jacopini the recording of the ''"Società anonima vendita penne bicolore Itala Cromograf"'' took place in Genoa in [[1941]] and maintained until [[1954]]. It is not clear whether this is a buyer for the production, or a full company, and there are rumors, but without any concrete evidence, that it was created by the Armando Simoni,<ref>it that could be the case, then it | + | But it seems that, at least from the point of view of the chamber of commerce registration, the date should be moved to the early '40s, since according to L. Jacopini the recording of the ''"Società anonima vendita penne bicolore Itala Cromograf"'' took place in Genoa in [[1941]] and maintained until [[1954]]. It is not clear whether this is a buyer for the production, or a full company, and there are rumors, but without any concrete evidence, that it was created by the Armando Simoni,<ref>it that could be the case, then it arise the doubt of why the pen has not been produced directly under the [[Omas]] brand.</ref> for the commercialization of the product. |
Versione attuale delle 11:18, 2 giu 2018
But it seems that, at least from the point of view of the chamber of commerce registration, the date should be moved to the early '40s, since according to L. Jacopini the recording of the "Società anonima vendita penne bicolore Itala Cromograf" took place in Genoa in 1941 and maintained until 1954. It is not clear whether this is a buyer for the production, or a full company, and there are rumors, but without any concrete evidence, that it was created by the Armando Simoni,[1] for the commercialization of the product.