Differenze tra le versioni di "Translations:Conway Stewart/9/en"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Creata pagina con 'The classification of Conway Stewart models is extremely complex, although since the '20s the company started using names, all the pens were still identified by a number ...') |
|||
Riga 1: | Riga 1: | ||
− | The classification of [[Conway Stewart]] models is extremely complex, although since the '20s the company started using names, all the pens were still identified by a number and sometimes only by that. In the '20s the top model (which will remain so for two decades) was the [[Duro]], a large pen, then there was the small and functional [[Dinkie]], and the economic [[Universal]]. Other models made in the same period were the [[Pixie]] and the [[Dandie]]. | + | The classification of [[Conway Stewart]] models is extremely complex, although since the '20s the company started using names, all the pens were still identified by a number and sometimes only by that. In the '20s the top model (which will remain so for two decades) was the [[Duro]], a large pen, then there was the small and functional [[Dinkie]], and the economic [[Conway Stewart Universal|Universal]]. Other models made in the same period were the [[Pixie]] and the [[Dandie]]. |
Versione attuale delle 00:29, 23 mar 2013
The classification of Conway Stewart models is extremely complex, although since the '20s the company started using names, all the pens were still identified by a number and sometimes only by that. In the '20s the top model (which will remain so for two decades) was the Duro, a large pen, then there was the small and functional Dinkie, and the economic Universal. Other models made in the same period were the Pixie and the Dandie.