Differenze tra le versioni di "Translations:Ink blot/2/en"

Da FountainPen.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 versioni intermedie di uno stesso utente non sono mostrate)
Riga 1: Riga 1:
−
In fact several subsequent studies (see [http://www.vintagepens.com/ink_blot.htm this article] by David Nishimura) have shown that this is one of the classic fake histories created by advertising departments, because there is no record of these facts in a company's official history published in 1904. Despite this, the  ''Ink Blot'' fake  history is still present in many texts and books on fountain pens. A deep and detailed [[Waterman]] early history reconstruction can be found in [http://home.comcast.net/~kirchh/Misc/Blotting_Out_the_Truth.pdf this long and documented article] by George Rimakis and Daniel Kirchheimer.
+
The story seems to have first appeared in [[1921]], (and the advertisement alongside that bears witness to an example is from [[1924]]), but was revived with pomp and circumstance in [[1934]] in celebration, a year late, of the fiftieth anniversary of the company's birth.  In fact several subsequent studies (see [http://www.vintagepens.com/ink_blot.htm this article] by David Nishimura) have shown that this is one of the classic fake histories created by advertising departments, because there is no record of these facts in a company's official history published in [[1904]]. Despite this, the  ''Ink Blot'' fake  history is still present in many texts and books on fountain pens. A deep and detailed [[Waterman]] early history reconstruction can be found in [https://danielkirchheimercom.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/blotting-out-the-truth-v40-0.pdf this long and documented article] by George Rimakis and Daniel Kirchheimer.

Versione attuale delle 14:14, 15 gen 2022

Informazioni sul messaggio (contribuisci)
Questo messaggio non ha documentazione. Se sai dove o come è usato questo messaggio, puoi aiutare gli altri traduttori aggiungendo la documentazione a questo messaggio.
Definizione del messaggio (Ink blot)
La storia sembra apparire per la prima volta nel [[1921]], (e la pubblicità a fianco che ne testimonia un esempio è del [[1924]]), ma venne ripresa in pompa magna nel [[1934]] in occasione della celebrazione, con un anno di ritardo, del cinquantesimo anniversario della nascita dell'azienda. In realtà diverse ricerche successive (vedi [http://www.vintagepens.com/ink_blot.htm questo articolo] di David Nishimura) han dimostrato che si tratta di una delle classiche bufale montate ad arte dai reparti pubblicitari in quanto non esiste alcuna traccia di questi fatti in una storia ufficiale dell'azienda pubblicata nel [[1904]]. Nonostante questo la storia è ancora presente in parecchi testi e libri sulle stilografiche. Per una ricostruzione molto più approfondita ed accurata della storia iniziale della [[Waterman]] si può fare riferimento a [https://danielkirchheimercom.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/blotting-out-the-truth-v40-0.pdf questo dettagliatissimo e documentato articolo] di George Rimakis e Daniel Kirchheimer.
TraduzioneThe story seems to have first appeared in [[1921]], (and the advertisement alongside that bears witness to an example is from [[1924]]), but was revived with pomp and circumstance in [[1934]] in celebration, a year late, of the fiftieth anniversary of the company's birth.  In fact several subsequent studies (see [http://www.vintagepens.com/ink_blot.htm this article] by David Nishimura) have shown that this is one of the classic fake histories created by advertising departments, because there is no record of these facts in a company's official history published in [[1904]]. Despite this, the  ''Ink Blot'' fake  history is still present in many texts and books on fountain pens. A deep and detailed [[Waterman]] early history reconstruction can be found in [https://danielkirchheimercom.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/blotting-out-the-truth-v40-0.pdf this long and documented article] by George Rimakis and Daniel Kirchheimer.

The story seems to have first appeared in 1921, (and the advertisement alongside that bears witness to an example is from 1924), but was revived with pomp and circumstance in 1934 in celebration, a year late, of the fiftieth anniversary of the company's birth. In fact several subsequent studies (see this article by David Nishimura) have shown that this is one of the classic fake histories created by advertising departments, because there is no record of these facts in a company's official history published in 1904. Despite this, the Ink Blot fake history is still present in many texts and books on fountain pens. A deep and detailed Waterman early history reconstruction can be found in this long and documented article by George Rimakis and Daniel Kirchheimer.

Estratto da "http://www.fountainpen.it/index.php?title=Translations:Ink_blot/2/en&oldid=172227"