Differenze tra le versioni di "Translations:Osmia/14/en"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(3 versioni intermedie di uno stesso utente non sono mostrate) | |||
Riga 1: | Riga 1: | ||
− | During the same period the company continued to produce under the [[Osmia]] brand, with [[mottled]] hard rubber [[safety]] pens, [[lever filler]] pens and mechanical pencils, which | + | During the same period the company continued to produce under the [[Osmia]] brand, with [[mottled]] hard rubber [[safety]] pens, [[lever filler]] pens and mechanical pencils, which retained the original logo on the cap. Around [[1930]], [[Parker]] withdrew because the [[Duofold]] sales did not have a great success because of a price too high for the German market, and a too rigid nib. The company went into liquidation and in 1932 the trademark and ownership structure was taken over by the ''"Osmia Füllhalter-Fabrik G. m. b. H."'',<ref>as can be seen in [[:File:1932-Papierhandler-Osmia-Liquidation.jpg|this news]].</ref>., again under the direction of the Böhler brothers. It was launched a new line, the [[Osmia Supra]], similar to the [[Duofold]], with an improved [[button filler]], and a brass enameled logo on top of the cap. |
Versione attuale delle 15:58, 16 set 2021
During the same period the company continued to produce under the Osmia brand, with mottled hard rubber safety pens, lever filler pens and mechanical pencils, which retained the original logo on the cap. Around 1930, Parker withdrew because the Duofold sales did not have a great success because of a price too high for the German market, and a too rigid nib. The company went into liquidation and in 1932 the trademark and ownership structure was taken over by the "Osmia Füllhalter-Fabrik G. m. b. H.",[1]., again under the direction of the Böhler brothers. It was launched a new line, the Osmia Supra, similar to the Duofold, with an improved button filler, and a brass enameled logo on top of the cap.