Differenze tra le versioni di "Ink blot/en"

Da FountainPen.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Creata pagina con "Ink blot")
 
 
(14 versioni intermedie di 2 utenti non mostrate)
Riga 1: Riga 1:
Con questo nome si suole fare riferimento alla storiella sulle origini della [[Waterman]] secondo cui ''Levis Edson Waterman'' avrebbe dato vita alla sua attività di costruttore di penne stilografiche dopo aver perso un lucroso contratto assicurativo a causa di una perdita di inchiostro da una penna mal funzionante. Secondo la storiella l'intraprendente fondatore invece di arrabbiarsi si sarebbe interessato all'oggetto, scoprendo il motivo del malfunzionamento e risolvendolo grazie alla creazione di sottili scanalature sull'alimentatore. Il successo della sua invenzione, fatta sperimentare ad amici e conoscenti lo avrebbe poi spinto a creare la sua azienda.
+
[[File:1924-09-Waterman-InkBlot.jpg|thumb|upright|French 40th anniversary advertisement telling the story]]
 +
The ''Ink Blot'' name is usually referred to the story about the origins of the [[Waterman]] Pen Company telling that ''Levis Edson Waterman'' started his own business as a fountain pens manufacturer after losing a lucrative insurance contract for the blot caused by an ink loss from a malfunctioning pen. According to this story instead of getting angry the company founder was interested in that object, discovering the reason for the malfunctioning and solving it by creating narrow channels on the feeder. The success of his invention, tested by his friends and acquaintances would have driven him to create his company.
  
In realtà diverse ricerche successive (vedi [http://www.vintagepens.com/ink_blot.htm questo articolo] di David Nishimura) han dimostrato che si tratta di una delle classiche bufale montate ad arte dai reparti pubblicitari in quanto non esiste alcuna traccia di questi fatti in una storia ufficiale dell'azienda pubblicata nel 1904. Nonostante questo la storia è ancora presente in parecchi testi e libri sulle stilografiche. Per una ricostruzione molto più approfondita ed accurata della storia iniziale della [[Waterman]] si può fare riferimento a [http://home.comcast.net/~kirchh/Misc/Blotting_Out_the_Truth.pdf questo dettagliatissimo e documentato articolo] di George Rimakis e Daniel Kirchheimer.
+
The story seems to have first appeared in [[1921]], (and the advertisement alongside that bears witness to an example is from [[1924]]), but was revived with pomp and circumstance in [[1934]] in celebration, a year late, of the fiftieth anniversary of the company's birth.  In fact several subsequent studies (see [http://www.vintagepens.com/ink_blot.htm this article] by David Nishimura) have shown that this is one of the classic fake histories created by advertising departments, because there is no record of these facts in a company's official history published in [[1904]]. Despite this, the  ''Ink Blot'' fake  history is still present in many texts and books on fountain pens. A deep and detailed [[Waterman]] early history reconstruction can be found in [https://danielkirchheimercom.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/blotting-out-the-truth-v40-0.pdf this long and documented article] by George Rimakis and Daniel Kirchheimer.
  
[[Category:Vocabolario]]
+
[[Category:Translated Pages]]

Versione attuale delle 14:14, 15 gen 2022

French 40th anniversary advertisement telling the story

The Ink Blot name is usually referred to the story about the origins of the Waterman Pen Company telling that Levis Edson Waterman started his own business as a fountain pens manufacturer after losing a lucrative insurance contract for the blot caused by an ink loss from a malfunctioning pen. According to this story instead of getting angry the company founder was interested in that object, discovering the reason for the malfunctioning and solving it by creating narrow channels on the feeder. The success of his invention, tested by his friends and acquaintances would have driven him to create his company.

The story seems to have first appeared in 1921, (and the advertisement alongside that bears witness to an example is from 1924), but was revived with pomp and circumstance in 1934 in celebration, a year late, of the fiftieth anniversary of the company's birth. In fact several subsequent studies (see this article by David Nishimura) have shown that this is one of the classic fake histories created by advertising departments, because there is no record of these facts in a company's official history published in 1904. Despite this, the Ink Blot fake history is still present in many texts and books on fountain pens. A deep and detailed Waterman early history reconstruction can be found in this long and documented article by George Rimakis and Daniel Kirchheimer.