Differenze tra le versioni di "Translations:Ink blot/2/en"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Riga 1: | Riga 1: | ||
− | In fact several subsequent studies (see [http://www.vintagepens.com/ink_blot.htm this article] by David Nishimura) have shown that this is one of the classic fake histories created by advertising departments, because there is no record of these facts in a company's official history published in 1904. Despite this, the ''Ink Blot'' fake history is still present in many texts and books on fountain pens. A deep and detailed [[Waterman]] early history reconstruction can be found in [http://home.comcast.net/~kirchh/Misc/Blotting_Out_the_Truth.pdf this long and documented article] by George Rimakis and Daniel Kirchheimer. | + | In fact several subsequent studies (see [http://www.vintagepens.com/ink_blot.htm this article] by David Nishimura) have shown that this is one of the classic fake histories created by advertising departments, because there is no record of these facts in a company's official history published in [[1904]]. Despite this, the ''Ink Blot'' fake history is still present in many texts and books on fountain pens. A deep and detailed [[Waterman]] early history reconstruction can be found in [http://home.comcast.net/~kirchh/Misc/Blotting_Out_the_Truth.pdf this long and documented article] by George Rimakis and Daniel Kirchheimer. |
Versione delle 00:33, 30 ott 2020
In fact several subsequent studies (see this article by David Nishimura) have shown that this is one of the classic fake histories created by advertising departments, because there is no record of these facts in a company's official history published in 1904. Despite this, the Ink Blot fake history is still present in many texts and books on fountain pens. A deep and detailed Waterman early history reconstruction can be found in this long and documented article by George Rimakis and Daniel Kirchheimer.