| The ''For Ever'' fountain pens are considered, according to the Emilio Dolcini analysis in his [[Omas]] book, mostly a production commissioned to [[Omas]] although Letizia Jacopini points out the possibility, especially for [[safety]] and [[overlay]] pens, whose style and processing does not correspond to the [[Omas]] one, that productions could have be done by others. But some sample of [[Omas]] and [[Minerva]] rebranded [[Germano]] pens have been found, as also, less common, some rebranded ''Ivo'' or ''La Stilografica Bologna'', confirming without possibility of denial the [[Omas]] production in favor of Germano. | | The ''For Ever'' fountain pens are considered, according to the Emilio Dolcini analysis in his [[Omas]] book, mostly a production commissioned to [[Omas]] although Letizia Jacopini points out the possibility, especially for [[safety]] and [[overlay]] pens, whose style and processing does not correspond to the [[Omas]] one, that productions could have be done by others. But some sample of [[Omas]] and [[Minerva]] rebranded [[Germano]] pens have been found, as also, less common, some rebranded ''Ivo'' or ''La Stilografica Bologna'', confirming without possibility of denial the [[Omas]] production in favor of Germano. |
− | <div class="mw-translate-fuzzy">
| + | The link with [[Omas]] is further confirmed by the registration in [[1941]], two years before the similar recording made by Armando Simoni, of the [[Permanio]] brand ({{Marchio|64310}}), just for ''"a metal alloy particularly suitable for the construction of nibs for fountain pens"''. It is unclear whether the trademark has been sold, although this seems to be the most likely hypothesis, considering the relationship between the two companies. |
− | The link with [[Omas]] is further confirmed by the registration in 1941, two years before the similar recording made by Armando Simoni, of the [[Permanio]] brand ({{Marchio|64310}}), just for ''"a metal alloy particularly suitable for the construction of nibs for fountain pens"''. It is unclear whether the trademark has been sold, although this seems to be the most likely hypothesis, considering the relationship between the two companies. | |